The Federal Reserve implemented a deep 75-basis point cut in interest rates. It is meant to stave off an impending rise in interest rates as liquidity flows towards fixed income securities and away from equities. Clearly, the Fed is concerned that this might result in a credit squeeze to other sectors of the economy, and cutting rates is meant to keep borrowing costs at manageable levels.
The jobs report in the following months will be critical because the fall out from the crisis will always translate to job loss. And the state of the job sector determines to a large extent, domestic consumption.
And then of course, retail sales figures would indicate whether the whole sub-prime crisis has affected the average consumer on the street.
Single-family home sales for 2007 fell 13% in the US, the biggest decline since 1982, while median prices decreased 1.8% from 2006.
One thing leads to another, slower US consumption means a slowdown in demand for imported items from anywhere else in the world. The US is an US$11 trillion economy. Which means, if it coughs, everybody else catches the cold. Japan's exports have started to decline, an obvious casualty of the US slowdown.
Closer to home, however, the US is the country's biggest export market. In addition, OFWs based in the US, might be affected by the sub-prime crisis. Remittances sent over to their families here in the Philippines will likely be affected as well.
OK, the impact of the fall out is obvious. But until when will this persist? Hard to say, but I believe this one is so different from the 1997 Asian financial crisis when a currency depreciation led to interest rates and inflation skyrocketing, resulting in bankruptcies and job losses.
For one, other fundamentally-sound sectors of the US economy remain strong. They may likely ride out this one. Which means the prudently-managed companies will be resilient enough while the riskier ones will likely close shop. After all, the crisis started from huge exposure to the very risky sub-prime credit market, and not due to any decline in domestic demand.
Secondly, there's strong consumption outside the US, especially the red-hot BRIC economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China, as well as the rest of Asia and Latin America.
Brazil has a successful bio-fuels industry which allows it to weather volatilities in oil markets. It is after all, a major sugar cane, soya and maize producer--the chief ingredients in biofuels. And so inflation-wise, Brazil's can be managed.
Russia's current wealth derives from its gas reserves. And this is fueling strong domestic demand. Putin's country is awash with cash.
Consumption spending in India and China have provided much of the impetus for growth, and take note, not all of this are due to demand in the US. As such, although the BPO sector may be affected as companies in the US cut on outsourcing, the fact the home consumption is growing at a very fast rate may provide the resilience to weather the bleak US outlook.
I'm a bit worried about India and China over the long-term, though. A quick look at inflation figures show that in both countries it is catching up fast with GDP growth, especially India.
China just released 2007 GDP figures, a blistering 11.4%, the highest in 13 years. It is poised to overtake Germany as the third largest economy in the world. Inflation averaged 4.8% for the year, although what is worrisome is the 6.9% and 6.5% posted in November and December, respectively.
This is important, because it indicates that both economies may, at some point in the near future, overheat. If credit-financed consumption growth exceeds the rise in real incomes-- the real estate boom and sky rocketing rental rates can sometimes be a sign of an impending crisis--you have a recipe for an economic recession.